🔻 IMPORTANT - Telegram Corporate Moderators
▪️ Telegram is becoming another Meta. It's wrong to claim that the Telegram company moderators don't do censorship of their own. They are company staff, which may include outsourcing teams. This doesn't include particular moderators of a particular group. It's the same with Meta: when they add their @SpamBot to your group, they can do it smoothly at their own will. Even without it, they could still do the same. Political bias is intruding on company moderators, just as it is with Meta. The worst thing is that their most irresponsible part is that they only one-sidedly judge and limit users even without any proof. Moreover, the Telegram corporate censorship team arrogantly uses unfit templates as “reasons.” This is a purely formalistic and biased approach to victims of trolls who are hiding behind the scenes, as well as the Telegram corporate moderators—not the particular group moderators—who are shielded in anonymity. They are safely doing the most socially irresponsible political censorship in the form of anti-SPAM like Meta platforms regularly do.
Note: Telegram has its own moderating team linked to @SpamBot as well as user moderators for individual groups in general. The political censorship referred to here is independent of the individual group moderators and is conducted by the Telegram team itself. This multi-layered, hidden mode of political censorship is despicable and worse than Meta because Meta still gives users a formalized appeal mechanism even if it’s insincere and biased, while Telegram does not.
Don’t pay Telegram! Don’t subscribe to Telegram Premium! Don’t add @SpamBot, which is the direct arm of Telegram staff members who politically censor users secretly behind the particular group moderators. The trolls know this method works when the group moderators are in the opposite political camp. The conclusion is that particular group moderators should protect users from Telegram corporate moderators.
🔻【重要】
Telegram 正在成為另一個 Meta。聲稱 Telegram是免受政治審查的平台是虛假的。同樣聲稱Telegram 公司本身的受聘版主團隊（機密部門）不會親自針對用戶進行政治審查也是錯誤的。他們是公司員工，可能包括外包團隊。這並不包括特定群組的特定版主。
Meta 也是一樣：當他們Telegram職員團隊在您的群組中加入他們的 @SpamBot 時，他們可以按照自己的意願順利獨自完成政治審查的可疑舉動。不過，即使沒有它，他們還是可以做同樣的事。政治偏見的問題正在侵擾該公司版主，就像 Meta 一樣。最糟糕的是，他們最不負責任的地方是，即使沒有任何證據，他們也只是片面地判斷，武斷和限制使用者。
此外，Telegram 公司審查團隊傲慢地使用內容不實，不適合的範本作為 「理由」。這對於隱藏在幕後的巨魔的受害者，以及隱姓匿名的 Telegram 企業版主 (不是特定群組版主) 來說，純粹是一種形式主義的偏見，也就是敷衍。他們就像 Meta 平台經常做的反垃圾郵件（SPAM）敘事一樣，安全地以反垃圾郵件（SPAM）的形式進行最不負責任的社會政治審查。
註解：Moderator在此譯成版主。Telegram有與@SpamBot連結的該公司本身的團隊以及一般各別群組的版主。在此指的政治審查是獨立於各別群組的版主，而Telegram公司本身的團隊親自進行的政治審查。這個多層次，隱藏式的政治審查運作模式是卑劣的，也是比Meta更惡劣，是因為Meta仍給用戶形式化的上訴機制，而Telegram不給。
不要付費給 Telegram！不要訂閱 Telegram Premium！不要添加 @SpamBot，這是 Telegram 職員的直接分支，他們在特定群組版主背後秘密地對使用者進行政治審查。當群組版主與政治陣營相反時，巨魔就知道這種方法很有效。結論是特定群組版主應該保護使用者不受 Telegram 企業版主的侵權。
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
Comments